this post is fantastic <a href=" http://conankun.net/page/36/#fasten ">tetracycline 250 mg acne reviews</a> While governments debate the proper response to the Syria attack, they miss a fundamental question: Why should Syrian use of chemical weapons have been the red line rather than the regimeâs possession? The West has known about Syriaâs possession of chemical weapons for decades. Regardless of who ordered the apparent sarin attack, the West can no longer rest assured that rogues who acquire unconventional weapons will not one day use them. While the 2003 Iraq War may have made preemption and unilateralism dirty words in Washington, perhaps it is time to revisit the 2002 U.S. National Security Strategy, which declared, âThere are few greater threats than a terrorist attack with WMD. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.â Diplomats may also want to reconsider the moral value of the United Nations which increasingly appears impotent in the face of grave and growing threats.